Right-sizing in packaging means adjusting a pack’s dimensions to match the product with minimal empty space, fewer fillers and lighter structures. It reduces waste without changing the product itself, so it avoids the impression of shrinkflation. The result is packaging that feels efficient, transparent and correctly sized.
Right-sizing in packaging has become a major 2026 efficiency shift, driven simultaneously by EU rules that require brands to prevent unnecessary packaging and by a sharp rise in consumer expectations around visible material reduction. Shoppers now pay attention not only to what a pack is made of, but also to whether its size makes sense for the product inside especially in e-commerce, where oversized boxes and excessive fillers have become symbols of waste. When a pack fits the product cleanly, with less void, lower dimensional weight and fewer protective inserts, the improvement is immediately noticeable during unboxing. It signals precision, intention and environmental responsibility without needing any additional claims. By removing empty space and unnecessary layers, right-sizing strengthens trust: the customer sees that the product remains the same while the packaging becomes more honest, proportional and efficient.
Right-sizing rises to prominence in 2026 because packaging is increasingly evaluated through compressed, high-density digital environments and the physical unboxing moment. Most product encounters begin online, where packaging appears as a small thumbnail in a marketplace grid or a social commerce feed. Oversized boxes or bloated formats offer no advantage in this context, they are invisible in miniature and irrelevant to digital decision-making. What matters instead is whether the packaging delivers a coherent impression of efficiency, purpose and material responsibility once the product arrives.
Consumer expectations have shifted sharply toward “no wasted air”. When a customer opens a shipment and sees a large box containing a small item cushioned by fillers, the disconnect is immediate. It signals inefficiency, unnecessary environmental impact and a lack of attention to detail. Conversely, a tightly fitted box communicates precision, optimisation and care. Right-sizing therefore becomes a visible form of trust-building, one that does not require marketing claims, sustainability icons or complex explanations. The improvement is self-evident through the physical form of the pack itself.
Regulatory pressure reinforces this behavioural shift. The EU’s direction toward preventing unnecessary packaging places responsibility on brands to justify every additional layer, void space or secondary component. Instead of “reducing after the fact”, companies must now design waste out at the structural level. This aligns with broader industry trends such as material minimisation, mono-material systems and recyclability-by-design. Right-sizing acts as the connective tissue across all these initiatives, ensuring that packaging is not only recyclable but also rational and proportional.
In e-commerce, right-sizing addresses persistent operational inefficiencies. Oversized parcels increase shipping volumes, raise transport emissions and escalate logistics costs. As carriers move toward volumetric pricing, excess air literally becomes an expense. Optimised structures reduce dimensional weight, improve pallet utilisation and simplify warehouse flows. For large retailers, even small dimensional reductions compound into significant system-wide impact.
Overall, right-sizing matters in 2026 because it sits at the intersection of consumer psychology, regulatory demand and logistical intelligence. It is both a sustainability action and a perceptual signal, something customers notice instantly and interpret as a reflection of brand integrity.
Right-sizing is effective not only because it reduces material, but because it aligns with how the human brain interprets proportion, effort and honesty. Packaging is one of the fastest-processed visual stimuli in commerce, and consumers draw conclusions about a brand long before they engage with the product itself. In 2026 this psychological layer becomes decisive, especially in e-commerce.
A key driver is the brain’s sensitivity to visual proportionality. Humans have evolved to detect mismatches between container and content - an oversized box with a small item triggers an immediate sense of inefficiency. The mind treats it as cognitive friction: “Why is this so big for what’s inside?” This friction lowers perceived value, even when the product remains unchanged, because the packaging violates expectations of rationality.
Another factor is effort attribution. When packaging appears excessively large or padded, consumers interpret it as a lack of care or attention to detail. By contrast, a well-fitted pack signals intentionality and competence. The brain rewards proportionality with perceptions of quality, precision and engineering intelligence. Right-sizing therefore functions as a trust cue: a small, efficient box subconsciously communicates that the brand invests effort in thoughtful design.
Right-sizing also intersects with environmental identity. Research shows that consumers increasingly evaluate brands through the lens of personal ecological values. A pack that visibly wastes materials creates dissonance, making the consumer feel complicit in unnecessary waste. A tighter, cleaner structure reduces this dissonance and supports the consumer’s self-image as someone who makes responsible choices. The unboxing becomes a confirmation of their values, not a contradiction.
Finally, right-sizing resolves the tension created by shrinkflation anxiety. Consumers are now primed to look for signs of deception in packaging; hidden air pockets, falsely inflated volumes or misleading forms. A right-sized pack removes ambiguity: the box looks exactly as large as it needs to be, which reduces suspicion. The tighter the fit, the more transparent the intention feels.
Together, these psychological effects make right-sizing more than an engineering trend. It becomes a perception strategy, a way to build credibility through proportion, effort and clarity.
Right-sizing works by rethinking packaging from the inside out. Instead of beginning with a standardised box and fitting the product into it, designers engineer structural components, geometry and protection systems around the actual dimensions and behaviour of the item. This approach eliminates default oversizing and replaces it with purposeful proportion. The core goal is simple: deliver the same level of protection with materially less volume.
The process typically begins with dimensional analysis. Teams map the exact footprint, height and fragility attributes of the product. From there, they evaluate whether the outer structure can be tightened, whether inserts can be simplified, or whether fillers can be removed entirely. Computational design and packaging simulation tools help determine the minimal safe distance between product and walls, ensuring that optimisation does not compromise durability.
Internal elements, such as trays, compartments and braces, are re-engineered to maintain security without adding redundant layers. Many brands shift from loose-fill solutions (paper, plastic or foam) toward custom-fit structures, die-cut supports or simpler folded forms that lock the product in place. These designs use less material and improve recyclability by reducing mixed substrates.
Right-sizing also involves material weight reduction. Secondary packaging, especially in e-commerce, can often be downgauged once void space is eliminated. Thinner corrugated boards or lighter mailers become viable because the pack no longer requires excess strength to compensate for poor internal stability.
Importantly, the right-sizing process is not purely technical. It also considers consumer perception. A well-executed right-sized pack must feel intentional, not cheapened. The closure experience, the inner reveal, the tactile feel of the board, these cues determine whether a customer interprets the reduction as responsible optimisation or as cost-driven minimisation.
In practice, right-sizing works when brands combine engineering accuracy with user experience design. The result is packaging that feels cleaner, smarter and more proportionate without reducing the product itself.
Right-sizing is often confused with shrinkflation, but the two concepts operate in opposite directions. Right-sizing reduces packaging; shrinkflation reduces the product. In right-sizing, the consumer receives the same item, quantity and value, only the pack becomes more efficient. In shrinkflation, the product itself diminishes while the packaging attempts to conceal the change.
The distinction is critical because consumers have developed a high sensitivity to perceived downsizing. Shrinkflation erodes trust precisely because it obscures reduction rather than communicating it. Packs remain nearly the same size, but internal contents shrink, a discrepancy that shoppers interpret as misleading. By contrast, right-sizing is inherently transparent. The improvement is visible, structural and easy to understand: the box is smaller because the waste has been removed, not the value.
Behaviourally, customers react positively to right-sizing when the pack feels more proportional and when the opening experience reinforces efficiency. They interpret precise fitting as a sign of respect for their time and the environment. Brands that adopt right-sizing build a form of credibility rooted in clarity, something shrinkflation cannot offer by definition.
From an operational perspective, shrinkflation is a tactic, whereas right-sizing is a design principle. Shrinkflation focuses on margin protection; right-sizing focuses on material optimisation and regulatory alignment. Shrinkflation uses the pack to hide change; right-sizing uses the pack to demonstrate it.
The two are often conflated in public discourse, which is why brands must articulate their intent clearly. When the product remains unchanged and the packaging is demonstrably more efficient, customers readily differentiate right-sizing from shrinkflation and respond far more positively to the former.
Right-sizing takes many different structural forms depending on the product category, but the underlying logic is consistent: remove empty space, simplify protective components and redesign geometry so the packaging supports the product rather than compensating for inefficient form. In 2026, brands increasingly adopt solutions that make material reduction visible and structurally meaningful, rather than hidden within the pack.
One common approach is void reduction - tightening the internal dimensions of boxes or mailers so they match the product footprint more closely. This often eliminates the need for paper wraps, plastic cushioning or “void-fill” materials that were previously used to stabilise the item. When void space decreases, protective performance improves because the product no longer shifts inside the pack, reducing the risk of damage during transport.
Another example is lighter secondary packaging. E-commerce boxes, which were traditionally over-engineered to accommodate fillers and unpredictable loads, can be downgauged once internal structures are optimised. Brands reduce corrugated thickness, remove unnecessary flutes or switch to mailers for smaller items. These adjustments cut shipping weight, increase pallet density and directly reduce carbon emissions.
A third pattern is the adoption of structurally intelligent inserts. Instead of relying on foam or multi-material combinations, companies introduce single-material, die-cut boards or folded structures that cradle the product. These solutions use geometry rather than bulk to absorb impact, making them easier to recycle and less material-intensive.
Finally, many brands redesign their packaging formats entirely, moving to form-fitting shapes, tapered walls or asymmetric structures that reflect the true form of the product. These changes create packaging that feels more premium and more intentional, because the design clearly reflects the real object it protects.
Although right-sizing is structurally beneficial, consumer trust can be sensitive especially in categories where shrinkflation has become a public concern. To avoid misinterpretation, brands must balance material reduction with clear intent and recognisable product value.
The most effective strategy is to keep the product quantity unchanged. When customers receive the same amount of product but in a better-fitted package, the improvement is immediately self-evident. Any change in formulation, volume or count, even if unrelated to packaging, creates perceptual risk and invites comparison to shrinkflation events in the category.
Communication also plays a major role. A short, factual on-pack note such as “This packaging uses 40% less material while delivering the same product” reframes the change as a sustainability improvement rather than a cost-cutting decision. Consumers respond positively when the purpose is explicit and honest, especially when the change matches broader environmental expectations.
Visual consistency matters, too. Keeping familiar brand cues; colour hierarchy, typography scale, layout structure helps customers recognise that the product identity has not changed. The packaging becomes smaller, but the brand presence remains stable, which reinforces continuity rather than disappearance.
Finally, the improvement must be felt during unboxing. When the structure opens smoothly, the product sits securely and excess materials are clearly absent, customers intuitively understand the difference between optimisation and reduction. The experience itself becomes the proof.
As right-sizing eliminates unnecessary material, a parallel shift is emerging in 2026: the elimination of unnecessary communication. Brands are recognising that packaging is not only a physical container but also an information interface, one that often overwhelms with graphics, claims and decorative elements that compete for attention without increasing clarity.
Light-integrated packaging, especially through printed, flexible OLED technology, represents this new direction. Instead of adding more ink, more colours or more layers to communicate value, brands are beginning to use precise, ultra-thin illumination to highlight only what matters: an activation moment, a brand mark, a freshness cue, a security element or a narrative detail. Light replaces clutter. One function replaces ten.
This parallel makes right-sizing and light-integration two expressions of the same design philosophy: remove what is unnecessary, illuminate what is essential.
Right-sizing reduces physical waste; light-integration reduces signal waste, the excess visual noise that obscures meaning on crowded shelves and in compressed digital thumbnails. Many brands struggle with communicating benefits effectively when packaging shrinks; OLED-enabled design solves that tension by offering a new, sensory layer of communication that does not require larger packaging or heavier graphics.
From a sustainability perspective, OLED-integrated cues add zero structural bulk. The lighting element is as thin as paper, flexible and embedded directly into the packaging substrate. Consumers therefore experience an advanced interface without additional layers or heavier boards. In a right-sized world, this matters: innovation cannot increase material footprint.
From a UX standpoint, printed OLED brings a moment of high-resolution clarity at exactly the point where consumers need it during unboxing, during usage, during shelf evaluation. It feels modern, intentional, and emotionally resonant. Unlike screens or LEDs, which signal “electronics,” printed OLED behaves like living print, merging seamlessly with the package.
Together, right-sizing and light-integration redefine what packaging is expected to do in 2026:
→ be materially efficient,
→ be communicatively precise,
→ and deliver an experience that feels engineered rather than decorative.
In this sense, OLED is a new design language that emerges naturally once brands remove unnecessary volume, unnecessary graphics and unnecessary noise.
Right-sizing is no longer a technical correction or a sustainability gesture; it has become a core design expectation in 2026. As packaging is increasingly judged through digital-first touchpoints and emotionally charged unboxing moments, the proportion between product and pack now acts as a trust signal. When packaging removes unnecessary volume, unnecessary inserts and unnecessary layers, the improvement is immediately visible and intuitively understood.
At the same time, the rise of light-integrated packaging shows that material efficiency is only half of the story. As brands remove physical waste, they also seek to remove communication waste, using precise, ultra-thin printed OLED illumination to highlight the moments that matter. Together, right-sizing and OLED-enabled design form a new era of packaging: one that is leaner, clearer, and engineered with intention. In 2026, packaging no longer needs to be bigger or louder to be effective. It needs to be purposeful in structure, in signalling and in experience.
If you’re exploring next-generation, light-integrated packaging that adds clarity without adding material, contact us.
This section is periodically updated as new data, market research, and technological developments emerge.
Is right-sizing the same as shrinkflation?
No. Right-sizing reduces packaging waste while keeping the product quantity unchanged. Shrinkflation reduces the product itself while the packaging attempts to conceal the change.
Does right-sizing compromise product protection?
Not when engineered correctly. By redesigning internal structures and reducing void, right-sizing often improves stability and lowers the risk of damage during transport.
Why do consumers react so strongly to oversized packaging?
Because the brain recognises disproportion as a sign of inefficiency. Large boxes with small items trigger cognitive friction and reduce perceived value, while tight-fit designs feel intentional and trustworthy.
How does right-sizing support sustainability goals?
It removes unnecessary materials, lowers shipping weight, reduces volumetric emissions and enables simpler mono-material systems, all of which help brands meet EU packaging requirements.
Can right-sizing work in premium categories?
Yes. Fit-to-product structures, tapered forms and intelligent inserts can enhance perceived quality by making the packaging feel tailored, precise and well-engineered.
How does OLED-integrated packaging complement right-sizing?
Light-integration reduces “signal waste” by replacing excessive graphics with precise illumination. It adds communication value without adding material, making it compatible with right-sized structures.
Last updated: February 2026
SOURCES:
(1)https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/packaging-and-packaging-waste-from-2026.html
(3)https://www.gleisslutz.com/en/know-how/new-eu-packaging-regulation-key-requirements-august-2026
(4)https://www.ryleon.com/news/sustainable-packaging-trends-2026-what-brands-in-europe-need-to-know
.svg)
